Williamstown Deed Records Show Wide Price Spread as Disclosed Sales Remain Scarce in June

WILLIAMSTOWN -- A sale at 148 South St. topped the local deed record at $1,130,000 for the four-week period ending June 26, standing well above the three other transactions with disclosed prices. Only four of 16 recorded deeds in Williamstown carried a stated consideration amount, limiting what the data can reliably show about broader market conditions.

• MARKET OVERVIEW
• Sixteen deeds were recorded in Williamstown between May 28 and June 26, but prices were disclosed in just four of those transactions. Among the four priced sales, the range ran from $20,000 to $1,130,000, with a median sale price of $195,000 — a figure that reflects only partial data and should be read with caution. The remaining 12 transfers carried no stated consideration, making a comprehensive market assessment impossible from this dataset alone. Several entries appear to reflect mortgage discharges, refinancing activity, or institutional document filings rather than arm's-length property sales.
• TOP SALES
• The highest-priced recorded transaction was 148 South St., which sold June 9 for $1,130,000. Olivier Meslay and Laure Meslay were listed as sellers; Eileen H. Dowling was listed as buyer. A second deed entry for the same address on the same date, with Dowling listed as seller and no consideration stated, suggests related document activity recorded simultaneously; the nature of that second instrument is not specified in the deed data.

518 Water St. recorded a sale June 11 for $340,000. Sellers were Paul O. Nnodim and Maryblessing A. Nnodim; the buyer of record is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and TD Bank N.A., indicating a mortgage instrument was recorded in connection with the transaction.

5 Windflower Way sold June 10 for $50,000. Seller Norman J. Immerman conveyed the property to MountainOne Bank; the nature of the transfer — whether a distressed conveyance, deed in lieu, or other instrument — is not specified in the deed record.

1993 Cold Spring Rd. recorded a consideration of $20,000 on June 10, with Jeffrey P. Gaskill as seller and Greylock Federal Credit Union as buyer. As with the Windflower Way entry, the transfer to a financial institution may reflect a non-market transaction; the deed record does not specify further.

• NEIGHBORHOOD BREAKDOWN
• South Street produced the period's only million-dollar transaction, with 148 South St. at $1,130,000 and a separate undisclosed-price entry at 115 South St. also appearing in the dataset — two of the 16 recorded instruments originating on that corridor.

North Hoosac Road appeared twice in the dataset: 1109 North Hoosac Rd. recorded June 12 with MountainOne Bank as seller, and 919 North Hoosac Rd. recorded May 28 with Adams Community Bank as seller — both with prices not disclosed and both involving financial institutions as grantors.

Sand Springs Road generated two deed entries for the same address, 218 Sand Springs Rd., both listing Thomas Joseph Aliberti and Cathleen Mary Aliberti as buyers and MountainOne Bank as seller, recorded June 5 and June 8. These appear to reflect separate mortgage document filings rather than two distinct property sales.

231 Bulkley St. also produced two entries on the same date, June 4, with Sandra Toll Goodbody conveying the property to a trust arrangement bearing the same names — a pattern consistent with an estate planning or trust transfer rather than a market sale. Price was not disclosed in either entry.

• MARKET NOTES
• Of the 16 recorded instruments, a notable share list banks or credit unions — MountainOne Bank, TD Bank, Adams Community Bank, Greylock Federal Credit Union, Bank of America, First American Mortgage Solutions, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems — as either grantor or grantee. This suggests many entries reflect mortgage recordings, discharges, or institutional conveyances rather than traditional buyer-to-seller sales. One deed entry carried no street address at all, listing only Williamstown as the location. With only four disclosed prices across 16 instruments, the dataset does not support reliable conclusions about residential market pricing trends for this period.